http://nytimes.com/2002/04/25/garden/25SHRE.html
Anita Shreve discusses her fascination with houses, particularly with
a white clapboard mansard-roof house on the coast of Maine that inspired
three of her novels:
The Pilot’s Wife (1998),
Fortune’s Rocks
(1999), and
Sea Glass (2002). “`You could base an entire life's
work on the people who come in and out of a house,’ she said.”
The article in the print edition of the
New York Times (front
page of the House & Home section, April 25, 2002) contains a photo
of the Maine house, although that photo does not appear in the Web edition.
(April 26, 2002)
Top
http://www.msnbc.com/news/742556.asp
Catch up with John Irving on a European tour for the release of the
French version of his novel
The Fourth Hand. Irving, whose books
are more popular in Europe, especially in Germany, than in the U.S., has
spent a lot of time in Europe and is as comfortable there as in his native
United States. “Europe is also the setting for his upcoming
Until I
Find You , in which the protagonist retraces a trip he took as a six-year-old
boy to Amsterdam, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Edinburgh.” Read Irving’s comments
on the state of the novel in general and on writer Tom Wolfe in particular.
(April 26, 2002)
Top
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0423/p15s01-lehl.html
Writer Patrik Jonsson examines the growing number of creative writing
courses and degree programs being offered by U.S. colleges and universities:
“As book sales hit an all-time high, more students are in pursuit of the
perfect paragraph at colleges across the United States. Schools are raising
the stakes and even staking their reputations on grooming great writers
– and fine-tuning their degrees to cater to the growing numbers of would-be
Faulkners and O'Connors entering their gates.” These creative writing programs
often find themselves in conflict with the traditional English department,
whose practitioners believe that students learn about good writing by studying
the works of good writers: “there's been `blood in the hallways’ over whether
students should be discussing the intricacies of Charlotte Brontë and
John Donne or eyeing one another's half-baked prose.” The teachers whom
Jonsson interviewed offer their views on the reasons why so many students
want to study creative writing and how such courses contribute to one’s
career pursuits.
(April 26, 2002)
Top
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0418/p17s01-bogn.html
We’ve heard a lot recently about scholars taking issue with material
in books published by historians Stephen Ambrose and Doris Kearns Goodwin.
But here’s a new twist on the topic: When publications favorably review
books that are later found to be inaccurate, does the reviewing publication
have an obligation to notify readers or, perhaps, to retract its review?
Writing in the
Christian Science Monitor, Kim Campbell addresses
the case of the book
Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture
by Michael Bellesiles, published in 2000. Read what historians, publishers,
book reviewers, and editors have to say on the subject.
(April 26, 2002)
Top
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0227/p14s03-lifp.html
“A study in the February issue of
Scientific American reports
that TV viewing can be as addictive as drinking, drugs, and gambling,” reports
Marilyn Gardner in this
Christian Science Monitor article. Gardner
praises the current trend of cities choosing a book for the residents to
read and discuss together. “There is something particularly touching about
the citywide ‘read-ins ‘ and the idealism, the yearning for community, that
drives them,” Gardner says. “In a high-tech age, the low-tech book is proving
daily that it can still hold its own.”
(April 26, 2002)
Top
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/020513/misc/13books.htm
“Since advertising dollars went south more than a year ago, newspapers
across the country have scaled back book sections–-never known as ad magnets-–in
order to save on newsprint,” reports Dan Gilgoff in
U.S. News & World
Report. Supporters of this trend say that newspaper book review sections
can’t draw enough advertising to justify a larger size. Critics of the
trend offer an interesting counterargument:
But many book section editors and critics say their newspapers are turning
a cold shoulder to book lovers at a time when they should be embraced, not
ceded to television and online news outlets. "I don't see how you can play
down your greatest strength as a newspaper: the written word," says [Philadelphia]
Inquirer Book Editor Frank Wilson. "It seems to me that people who
are into reading are the core newspaper consumers."
(May 12, 2002)
Top
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/07/travel/07KRUG.html?rd=hcmcp?p=0432lE0432iD47n7b012000mZ6CeZ683
Check out the summer reading lists of authors Michael Connelly, Andre
Dubus III, Dick Francis, E. Lynn Harris, Faye Kellerman, Terry McMillan,
Walter Mosley, James Patterson, Nora Roberts, and Anita Shreve.
(May 12, 2002)
Top
http://www.usatoday.com/life/enter/books/2002/2002-05-23-summer-books.htm
If you’re planning your summer vacation and are looking for “beach reads”
to take along, consider this from
USA Today:
According to Carl Lennertz, the publisher program director of
Book Sense, part of the American Booksellers Association, the image of the
toss away no-brainer beach book is passé. "Smart publishers have taken
summertime back for serious books. Beach reading now means light fiction
and serious nonfiction. One of the first breakthroughs was Truman in
hardcover a few years back, launched in time for Father's Day, and then it
carried over into the summer."
This article describes some of the books due to hit stores this summer.
Expected to be one of the biggest hits is Tom Clancy’s
Red Rabbit
, “a prequel to the 1984 book that made him a star of book and film:
The Hunt for Red October. It's Jack Ryan, the early years. He's a young
CIA analyst trying to unravel a plot involving the potential assassination
of Pope John Paul II.”
Red Rabbit will hit bookstore shelves on August
5.
(May 23, 2002)
http://contemporarylit.about.com/library/weekly/aa043002.htm
About.com lists the recently announced prize winners in the following
categories: fiction, first novel, poetry, biography, mystery/thriller, and
young adult fiction.
(May 23, 2002)
http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i34/34b00701.htm
Writing in
The Chronicle of Higher Education, Anonymous, a professor
of English at an American university, details how her academic career contributed
to her alcoholism. “No profession can make someone an addict, but every profession
can enable addiction with its stories and romanticizations,” she says. Her
problem began with the romantic notion of the relationship between alcohol
and creativity, then grew, fed by the stereotypes of writers who did their
best work while drunk and, later, of eccentric professors who were most
brilliant while slightly sloshed. Fascinating reading.
(May 23, 2002)
http://www.msnbc.com/news/751980.asp
Publishing industry insiders are reacting to a study released recently
by the Book Industry Study Group:
There was one line of good news in the report: Americans will
spend slightly more on adult and juvenile books during the next five years.
And several paragraphs of bad news: Books will cost more and fewer will
be sold.
The BISG warns that the total number of books sold will continue to decline
through 2006 and “forecasts that publishers will be selling fewer and fewer
juvenile books in the future.” One bookstore owner offers a possible explanation:
“ ‘Chicken Soup’ books,” she explains. “That kind of pure
commercial product has probably diluted the market for serious books that
require more of an attention span, an attention span that has been frayed
by everything in contemporary society.”
Her solution to the problem? “People need to read more.”
Some industry executives don’t agree with the forecast of gloom for the
publishing industry, including Patricia Schroeder, president of the Association
of American Publishers. Yet publisher Michael Cader warns that the problem
will continue:
. . . a potential decline in young readers will make the
situation worse when those kids grow up. It raises urgent questions about
everything from book pricing to how we treat reading in our society and use
technology to grow audiences.
(May 23, 2002)
Top
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/25/international/europe/25BOOK.html
International intrigue is brewing in the world of literary prizes.
Here’s the backstory: the Booker Prize for Fiction, the U.K.’s answer to
the (American) Pulitzer Prize, annually honors English-language fiction
by authors from parts of the world other than the United States. Recently
the Booker Prize signed a new sponsor, the Man Group. “Currently, the Man
Group manages money mostly for wealthy non-Americans. The company makes
no secret of the lure of the Booker sponsorship as an entree into the United
States, where it wants to expand its business among the kind of (it believes,
well-heeled) people who read quality literature.”
When, as a result of this new sponsorship, organizers of the Booker Prize
suggested that American authors might be included in the judging by 2004,
the British literary world reacted. Lisa Jardine, an academic who is the
chairwoman of this year’s panel of Booker judges, reportedly said that “modern
British writers such as Ian McEwan and Martin Amis [. . .] might just not
have the literary oomph to take on such American heavy hitters as Saul Bellow
and Philip Roth. [. . .] ‘With someone like Roth at his best,’ she was quoted
as saying, ‘I can't see how an Amis or a McEwan could touch him. The American
novelists paint on a much bigger canvas.’”
So “what began as just one more deal at the murky interface of art and
commerce turned rapidly into a full-blown debate embracing some familiar
ogres: American cultural imperialism, along with less muscular depictions
of Britons proud of their past but cringing from the shadows of the Great
American Novel,” says
New York Times writer Alan Cowell. Moreover,
Cowell says, “there lurks a nagging sense among some Britons that the cradle
of the English language has nurtured offspring too powerful to be controlled.”
Presumably the debate will continue over whether the U.K. should open its
literary prize to American competition. Read Cowell’s article to see what
former Booker Prize winners Salman Rushdie, Ian McEwan, and Arundhati Roy
have to say about competing with American novelists.
(May 25, 2002)